By Cimba Shepherd Nhamo Zimbabwe’s High Court has made a groundbreaking decision, declaring a section of the Immigration Act unconstitutional. On November 12, 2024, Justice Christopher Dube-Banda delivered the landmark ruling, which has far-reaching implications for the rights of suspected illegal foreigners in Zimbabwe. The section in question allowed immigration officers to detain individuals for up to 14 days without a court appearance, violating international and regional conventions, as well as Zimbabwe’s Constitution.Tatenda Chakabva’s argument that this section infringed upon the rights of suspected illegal foreigners, denying them liberty and undermining the Constitution’s values, was upheld by the court. The ruling emphasizes that individuals detained by immigration officers must now be brought to court within 48 hours to determine the legality of their arrest and detention. Detention beyond the 48-hour limit without judicial oversight is deemed unlawful and infringes on detainees’ rights to dignity and freedom.This decision underscores the importance of protecting human rights and upholding constitutional values. It sets a crucial precedent for immigration laws in Zimbabwe, ensuring foreign nationals are treated with dignity and respect. The chief immigration officer had argued that the section only applied to individuals who entered Zimbabwe illegally and were suspected of being prohibited immigrants. However, Justice Dube-Banda emphasized that the Constitution is the supreme law of Zimbabwe, and any practice inconsistent with it is invalid.This ruling marks a significant step towards ensuring that immigration laws align with constitutional values while still allowing for the arrest and processing of suspected illegal immigrants after a court appearance. It’s a major victory for human rights and the rule of law in Zimbabwe. The decision is also in line with previous rulings, such as the case of Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights. Zimbabwe, where the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights declared that deportation of a journalist was an infringement of article 9 of the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights.Overall, this landmark ruling is a significant milestone in the protection of human rights in Zimbabwe, and its implications will be felt for years to come. Post navigation Fuel Scandal Rocks Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission: Administration Officer Accused of $33,520 Fraud Justice Served: Former NatPharm Manager Awarded $1 Million for Unfair Dismissal